<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Eengstro’s Blog &#187; software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.eengstro.com/tag/software/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.eengstro.com</link>
	<description>Just another typical white geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:49:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t they have competent admins?</title>
		<link>http://blog.eengstro.com/2008/06/11/dont-they-have-competent-admins</link>
		<comments>http://blog.eengstro.com/2008/06/11/dont-they-have-competent-admins#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 02:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eengstro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eengstro.com/?p=332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From a news item today:

WASHINGTON &#8211; Multiple congressional computers have been hacked by people working from inside China, lawmakers said Wednesday, suggesting the Chinese were seeking lists of dissidents.
Two congressmen, both longtime critics of Beijing&#8217;s record on human rights, said the compromised computers contained information about political dissidents from around the world. One of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080612/ap_on_go_co/china_hacking">news item</a> today:</p>
<blockquote><p>
WASHINGTON &#8211; Multiple congressional computers have been hacked by people working from inside China, lawmakers said Wednesday, suggesting the Chinese were seeking lists of dissidents.</p>
<p>Two congressmen, both longtime critics of Beijing&#8217;s record on human rights, said the compromised computers contained information about political dissidents from around the world. One of the lawmakers said he&#8217;d been discouraged from disclosing the computer attacks by other U.S. officials.</p>
<p>Rep. Frank Wolf, R-Va., said four of his computers were compromised beginning in 2006. New Jersey Rep. Chris Smith, a senior Republican on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said two of the computers at his global human rights subcommittee were attacked in December 2006 and March 2007.</p>
<p>Wolf said that following one of the attacks, a car with license plates belonging to Chinese officials went to the home of a dissident in Fairfax County, Va., outside Washington and photographed it.
</p></blockquote>
<p>These kinds of security breaches are not only preventable, they are inexcusable. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s easy to blame the attacker, but real problem lies at home. Congressional computers should be some of the best-secured PCs on the Internet. The fact that they apparently aren&#8217;t indicates a problem with Congress, not with China. I don&#8217;t know whether the blame lies with lax or crappy admins, or with ignorant congresscritters who inevitably will get their way when they whine, &#8220;but this anti-virus thingy makes it too hard!&#8221;. If action on the floor of the House and Senate to address the latter is necessary, then the more technically-sophisticated members of Congress need to get busy.</p>
<p>Slashdot post <a href="http://it.slashdot.org/it/08/06/11/2218223.shtml">here</a>. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.eengstro.com/2008/06/11/dont-they-have-competent-admins/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Team Fortress 2 rendering glitches</title>
		<link>http://blog.eengstro.com/2008/03/04/team-fortress-2-rendering-glitches</link>
		<comments>http://blog.eengstro.com/2008/03/04/team-fortress-2-rendering-glitches#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 07:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eengstro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[team fortress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TF2 glitch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eengstro.com/2008/03/04/team-fortress-2-rendering-glitches/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ I&#8217;ve been seeing more and more rendering glitches in Team Fortress 2 on my ATI X800 XT recently. The glitches always happen to characters or buildings only; the environment always renders correctly. Polygons will either stretch to infinity (sometimes as few as one, or every polygon in a character model), or they&#8217;ll &#8220;fan&#8221;, facing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://blog.eengstro.com/2008/03/04/team-fortress-2-rendering-glitches/team-fortress-render-glitch-1/' rel='attachment wp-att-271' title='Team Fortress render glitch 1'><img src='http://blog.eengstro.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/render-glitch-1-small.jpg' alt='Team Fortress render glitch 1' class='alignright' /></a> I&#8217;ve been seeing more and more rendering glitches in <a href="http://orange.half-life2.com/tf2.html">Team Fortress 2</a> on my <a href="http://ati.amd.com/products/radeonx800/aiwx800xt/index.html">ATI X800 XT</a> recently. The glitches always happen to characters or buildings only; the environment always renders correctly. Polygons will either stretch to infinity (sometimes as few as one, or every polygon in a character model), or they&#8217;ll &#8220;fan&#8221;, facing the wrong direction. The sentryguns in the screen capture here are doing both simultaneously. </p>
<p><a href='http://blog.eengstro.com/2008/03/04/team-fortress-2-rendering-glitches/steam-friends-list-glitch/' rel='attachment wp-att-273' title='Steam friends list glitch'><img src='http://blog.eengstro.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/steam-glitch-1.thumbnail.png' alt='Steam friends list glitch' class='alignleft' /></a> I&#8217;m not sure if this is a bug or a hardware issue, but I&#8217;m suspecting the latter, as I&#8217;m the only one I know of (so far) that is seeing this. My first step is to monitor the temperature of the video card with <a href="http://www.techpowerup.com/atitool/">ATITool</a> while playing. (I&#8217;m not overclocking the card, just monitoring the temperature.) The next time it glitches, I want to know if the card is overheating.</p>
<p>Also funny is what happens to Steam after quitting a session of TF2 that&#8217;s been glitching. As you can see, Steam&#8217;s glitching too!</p>
<p>Hopefully I&#8217;ll turn something up on this. In the meantime, I&#8217;ll post more screen captures as I manage to get them.</p>
<p><b>Update:</b> Followup post <a href="http://blog.eengstro.com/2008/03/08/more-team-fortress-2-rendering-glitches/">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.eengstro.com/2008/03/04/team-fortress-2-rendering-glitches/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Norton 2007 subscription problems</title>
		<link>http://blog.eengstro.com/2007/12/02/norton-2007-subscription-problems</link>
		<comments>http://blog.eengstro.com/2007/12/02/norton-2007-subscription-problems#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 20:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eengstro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[norton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech support]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eengstro.com/2007/12/02/norton-2007-subscription-problems/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My installation of Norton Internet Security 2007 stopped working recently. The main dialog said that I had a &#8220;subscription problem&#8221;. This didn&#8217;t make a whole lot of sense, since I still have at least 6 months remaining on my Norton subscription.
As it turns out, I received an email from Symantec recently, advertising that the latest [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My installation of Norton Internet Security 2007 stopped working recently. The main dialog said that I had a &#8220;subscription problem&#8221;. This didn&#8217;t make a whole lot of sense, since I still have at least 6 months remaining on my Norton subscription.</p>
<p>As it turns out, I received an email from Symantec recently, advertising that the latest and greatest Norton Internet Security 2008 was available as a free upgrade. So, apparently, once Norton 2008 was released, Symantec stopped supporting 2007! Downloading and installing the free upgrade solved the subscription problem, and all is once again happy in Norton-land.</p>
<p>Now, this rather annoys me. Free upgrades are well and good, but <i>forcing</i> the user to upgrade to receive continued support is, to put it lightly, quite rude. Perhaps I wouldn&#8217;t have minded so much if the original error message said something like, &#8220;Subscription Problem: Please upgrade to Norton 2008 (it&#8217;s free).&#8221; But no, all it said was &#8220;subscription problem&#8221;, which left me scratching my head quite unnecessarily. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.eengstro.com/2007/12/02/norton-2007-subscription-problems/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Closing a file to save it: bad idea</title>
		<link>http://blog.eengstro.com/2007/10/05/closing-a-file-to-save-it-bad-idea</link>
		<comments>http://blog.eengstro.com/2007/10/05/closing-a-file-to-save-it-bad-idea#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 23:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eengstro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compuware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gripe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eengstro.com/2007/10/05/closing-a-file-to-save-it-bad-idea/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At work, I&#8217;m experimenting with a code profiling tool called  	DevPartner Performance Analysis Community Edition from Compuware. 
The user manual &#8212; a 410 page PDF file, yuck &#8212; contains this nugget of wisdom on page 228:

When you have finished reviewing performace data you can save the session file.
1. Close the session file window in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At work, I&#8217;m experimenting with a code profiling tool called <a href="http://www.compuware.com/media.asp?cid=701000000004ej0"> 	DevPartner Performance Analysis Community Edition</a> from <a href="http://www.compuware.com/">Compuware</a>. </p>
<p>The user manual &#8212; a 410 page PDF file, yuck &#8212; contains this nugget of wisdom on page 228:</p>
<blockquote><p>
When you have finished reviewing performace data you can save the session file.</p>
<p>1. Close the session file window in Visual Studio. DevPartner prompts you to save the session file.<br />
2. Click OK to accept the default file name and location.</p>
<p>DevPartner saves session files as part of the active solution. They appear in the DevPartner Studio virtual folder in Solution Explorer.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Telling the user to <b>close</b> an unsaved file in order to <b>save</b> it is <i>very bad advice!</i> Closing an unsaved file is a destructive operation, i.e. it will blow away your unsaved data. Just because most well-behaved programs will prompt the user to save first is no excuse for telling the user to close a file in order to save it.</p>
<p>So, what happened when I closed my profiling session without saving it? Mind you, this was done as an experiment, purely in the interests of science, or something. <b>BLAM!</b> Visual Studio and DevPartner dutifully vaporized an hour&#8217;s worth of work without a single hint of a save dialog. </p>
<p>Way to go, Compuware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.eengstro.com/2007/10/05/closing-a-file-to-save-it-bad-idea/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thoughts on Battlefield 2</title>
		<link>http://blog.eengstro.com/2007/09/27/thoughts-on-battlefield-2</link>
		<comments>http://blog.eengstro.com/2007/09/27/thoughts-on-battlefield-2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 19:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eengstro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battlefield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eengstro.com/2007/09/27/thoughts-on-battlefield-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I play Battlefield 2 once or twice a week. I&#8217;m not particularly good, but it&#8217;s fun to play with a squad of friends. 
The latest patch introduced the &#8220;Infantry Only&#8221; option. This loads a map without vehicles. This can be fun if everyone on the server squads up. However, it&#8217;s really only appropriate for smaller [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I play Battlefield 2 once or twice a week. I&#8217;m not particularly good, but it&#8217;s fun to play with a squad of friends. </p>
<p>The latest patch introduced the &#8220;Infantry Only&#8221; option. This loads a map without vehicles. This can be fun if everyone on the server squads up. However, it&#8217;s really only appropriate for smaller city maps. Large maps like Wake Island are just too big to traverse on foot, as I discovered last night.</p>
<p>Many servers are running Infantry Only these days. Almost every server running Karkand (at least servers with players logged in) is in Infantry Only mode. In fact, last night I decided I wanted to play with vehicles for a while, but I simply couldn&#8217;t find a server that had players logged in, and was not infantry only. This was quite a bummer.</p>
<p>Since the introduction of Battlefield 2142, it seems that most players have abandoned Battlefield 2. This is probably a good thing overall, since the people left playing Battlefield 2 regularly tend to be better and more polite players. There also tends to be less rude namecalling, teamkilling, and other shenanigans since most of the asshole kids are, presumably, playing 2142. </p>
<p>However, this smaller cadre of players seem to prefer Infantry Only. And, the smaller number of players overall leads to a lot of empty servers. (You&#8217;d think that with the smaller number of players, the account servers would run faster. Nope, they take FOREVER.)</p>
<p>With Team Fortress 2 and Quakewars on the horizon, I suspect that our little clan will move on from Battlefield 2 pretty soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.eengstro.com/2007/09/27/thoughts-on-battlefield-2/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Norton Firewall requires Administrator access</title>
		<link>http://blog.eengstro.com/2007/08/26/norton-firewall-requires-administrator-access</link>
		<comments>http://blog.eengstro.com/2007/08/26/norton-firewall-requires-administrator-access#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 19:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eengstro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gripe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[norton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eengstro.com/2007/08/26/norton-firewall-requires-administrator-access/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yet another reason that Norton Internet Security sucks: When a user is logged in to Windows Vista with a &#8220;Standard user&#8221; account, the Program Control feature of Norton&#8217;s Personal Firewall will always block new or unfamiliar programs. It will also always block programs that have been updated (which, since they have changed, are treated as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet another reason that Norton Internet Security sucks: When a user is logged in to Windows Vista with a &#8220;Standard user&#8221; account, the Program Control feature of Norton&#8217;s Personal Firewall will <b>always</b> block new or unfamiliar programs. It will also <b>always</b> block programs that have been updated (which, since they have changed, are treated as &#8220;new or unfamiliar&#8221;). Because Firefox and IE update themselves regularly, this is a major annoyance.</p>
<p>This problem happens whether the Firewall Processing is set to &#8220;Automatically decide what to do&#8221; or &#8220;Ask me what to do&#8221;. Neither setting works in a Standard user account: </p>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;Automatically decide&#8221; doesn&#8217;t have write access to the Program Control list, so Norton can&#8217;t unblock a program even if it wants to;</li>
<li>&#8220;Ask me&#8221; doesn&#8217;t ask.</li>
</ul>
<p>The upshot is that a &#8220;Standard user&#8221; account eventually becomes unusable (for Internet access) because Norton&#8217;s firewall won&#8217;t change its settings to &#8220;re-allow&#8221; an updated Firefox or IE to access the Internet.</p>
<p>To fix a blocked program in a Standard user account, one must access Norton&#8217;s Program Control settings (Start -> All Programs -> Norton Internet Security -> Norton Internet Security -> Settings -> Personal Firewall -> Configure -> Program Control). Note that this requires an administrator account password after clicking Configure. Click the program you wish to allow access to (Firefox, IE, etc). Yes, it is probably listed with an Access level of Auto or Allow, but Norton is lying to you &#8212; it&#8217;s actually blocked, and will remain blocked even if you fiddle with the Access setting. Note the path to the program&#8217;s .exe file (i.e. <code>C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\firefox.exe</code>). Click Remove, then click Yes to confirm. Now, click Add, navigate to the program&#8217;s .exe file (you just noted that path earlier), and double-click the executable file (note that Vista might hide the &#8220;.exe&#8221; part of the filename). Choose &#8220;Allow&#8221;, then click OK. Finally, click OK (or Apply) to dismiss the main Options window.</p>
<p>The other potential fix is to run an Administrator account rather than a Standard user account. In an Administrator account, both &#8220;Automatically decide&#8221; and &#8220;Ask me&#8221; will work correctly. Note the irony: a <b>security program</b> forcing the user to use an Administrator account, which is <b>less secure</b> than a Standard user account! This might be even worse than McAfee using ActiveX controls in its interface. But at least you won&#8217;t have to &#8220;fix&#8221; the Program Control every every time your browser updates itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.eengstro.com/2007/08/26/norton-firewall-requires-administrator-access/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MySpace is so half-assed</title>
		<link>http://blog.eengstro.com/2007/08/11/myspace-is-so-half-assed</link>
		<comments>http://blog.eengstro.com/2007/08/11/myspace-is-so-half-assed#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 00:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eengstro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gripe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eengstro.com/2007/08/11/myspace-is-so-half-assed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sit and admire one of the more amusing/frustrating error messages I&#8217;ve received from MySpace:

MySpace is an example of what happens when you release a half-assed, hacked together demo to the world instead of a fully-designed and tested product (i.e. something you actually thought through beforehand). You have to keep fixing it, and yet it never [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sit and admire one of the more amusing/frustrating error messages I&#8217;ve received from <a href="http://myspace.com">MySpace</a>:</p>
<p><a href='http://blog.eengstro.com/2007/08/11/myspace-is-so-half-assed/myspace-database-issues/' rel='attachment wp-att-213' title='MySpace database issues'><img src='http://blog.eengstro.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/myspace-down.png' alt='MySpace database issues' /></a></p>
<p>MySpace is an example of what happens when you release a half-assed, hacked together demo to the world instead of a fully-designed and tested product (i.e. something you actually thought through beforehand). You have to keep fixing it, and yet it never works quite right all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.eengstro.com/2007/08/11/myspace-is-so-half-assed/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scroll wheel click issues in FireFox</title>
		<link>http://blog.eengstro.com/2007/06/15/scroll-wheel-click-issues-in-firefox</link>
		<comments>http://blog.eengstro.com/2007/06/15/scroll-wheel-click-issues-in-firefox#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 03:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eengstro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logitech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misfeature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SetPoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eengstro.com/2007/06/15/scroll-wheel-click-issues-in-firefox/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In FireFox (and Internet Explorer 7 as well), you can open a link in a new tab by clicking on it with the scroll wheel. Similarly, you can close an open tab by scroll-wheel clicking it. (Push straight down on the scroll wheel rather than rolling it; it functions like a middle, or third, mouse [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/">FireFox</a> (and Internet Explorer 7 as well), you can open a link in a new tab by clicking on it with the scroll wheel. Similarly, you can close an open tab by scroll-wheel clicking it. (Push straight down on the scroll wheel rather than rolling it; it functions like a middle, or third, mouse button.) This is very nifty, and I use it all the time.</p>
<p>I recently discovered that middle-clicking was broken in Firefox 2 on the our Windows Vista box. We use a Logitech bluetooth mouse with this machine. It turns out that the problem is with Logitech&#8217;s SetPoint mouse software. Fortunately, it is a simple misconfiguration that is easy to fix.</p>
<p>First, you need to get to Logitech&#8217;s SetPoint control panel. This <i>should</i> be accessible through your <b>Mouse</b> control panel. (In the Control Panel, make sure you&#8217;re in Classic View.) </p>
<p><a href='http://blog.eengstro.com/2007/06/15/scroll-wheel-click-issues-in-firefox/mouse-control-panel/' rel='attachment wp-att-194' title='Mouse control panel.'><img src='http://blog.eengstro.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/mouse-properties.png' alt='Mouse control panel.' /></a></p>
<p>Click the <b>SetPoint Settings</b> tab. This will close the Mouse control panel, and open the SetPoint software. Under <b>Select Button</b>, click on the entry labeled <b>3</b>. It will probably be set to &#8220;AutoScroll&#8221;. <i>That&#8217;s</i> the problem. </p>
<p><a href='http://blog.eengstro.com/2007/06/15/scroll-wheel-click-issues-in-firefox/setpoint-autoscroll/' rel='attachment wp-att-195' title='SetPoint autoscroll'><img src='http://blog.eengstro.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/setpoint-autoscroll.png' alt='SetPoint autoscroll' /></a></p>
<p>Now, under Select Task, click <b>Other</b>. In the Select Task dialog that appears, choose <b>Middle Button</b>. Then, <b>OK</b> to dismiss the dialog. Back in the SetPoint program, click <b>Apply</b> to apply the settings change, then <b>OK</b> to close SetPoint.</p>
<p><a href='http://blog.eengstro.com/2007/06/15/scroll-wheel-click-issues-in-firefox/setpoint-select-task/' rel='attachment wp-att-196' title='SetPoint select task'><img src='http://blog.eengstro.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/setpoint-select-task.png' alt='SetPoint select task' /></a></p>
<p><a href='http://blog.eengstro.com/2007/06/15/scroll-wheel-click-issues-in-firefox/setpoint-middle-button/' rel='attachment wp-att-197' title='SetPoint middle button'><img src='http://blog.eengstro.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/setpoint-middle-button.png' alt='SetPoint middle button' /></a></p>
<p>Clicking with the scroll wheel should now behave properly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.eengstro.com/2007/06/15/scroll-wheel-click-issues-in-firefox/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vista Bluescreen</title>
		<link>http://blog.eengstro.com/2007/06/10/vista-bluescreen</link>
		<comments>http://blog.eengstro.com/2007/06/10/vista-bluescreen#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 01:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eengstro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bluescreen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eengstro.com/2007/06/10/vista-bluescreen/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I witnessed my first Windows Vista bluescreen today. The box was in the middle of being put into Sleep mode when it was awakened again, and blam: a bluescreen. (It could be said that we had a vista of a bluescreen&#8230;) Unfortunately, the bluescreen didn&#8217;t stay up long enough for me to actually read it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I witnessed my first Windows Vista bluescreen today. The box was in the middle of being put into Sleep mode when it was awakened again, and blam: a bluescreen. (It could be said that we had a vista of a bluescreen&#8230;) Unfortunately, the bluescreen didn&#8217;t stay up long enough for me to actually read it and see what crashed; the machine rebooted on its own almost immediately.</p>
<p>Hopefully these won&#8217;t be common. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.eengstro.com/2007/06/10/vista-bluescreen/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox 2&#8217;s session restore</title>
		<link>http://blog.eengstro.com/2007/06/08/firefox-2s-session-restore</link>
		<comments>http://blog.eengstro.com/2007/06/08/firefox-2s-session-restore#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 00:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eengstro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eengstro.com/2007/06/08/firefox-2s-session-restore/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I finally upgraded my work box to Firefox 2 today. I have to say that the Session Restore feature is pretty cool: all seven of my open tabs were reloaded (including my gmail session) without a hitch. 
Of course, it would have been cooler if Firefox hadn&#8217;t crashed&#8230;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finally upgraded my work box to <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/">Firefox 2</a> today. I have to say that the <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/features#sessionrestore">Session Restore</a> feature is pretty cool: all seven of my open tabs were reloaded (including my gmail session) without a hitch. </p>
<p>Of course, it would have been cooler if Firefox <i>hadn&#8217;t crashed&#8230;</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.eengstro.com/2007/06/08/firefox-2s-session-restore/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
